<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekly Brain Teaser &#124; Consider a vertical wheel of radius 10 cm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/</link>
	<description>Relevant News and Notes for Engineering Professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:20:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sprayberry</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/comment-page-4/#comment-1295</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sprayberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringdaily.net/?p=554#comment-1295</guid>
		<description>Here is the magic trick to this puzzle no one has pointed out yet:

Imagine you open up the large wheel into a straight line.  Easy math tells us the small wheel will roll 5 times around if it travels the length of the straight line.  Well if the line is curved back up into a circle (wheel), then the line is the same length and the small wheel has not changed, so why does it take 6 (instead of 5) rotations to go around?  The answer if 5 + 1 really.  The 5 rotations along the line PLUS one more big rotation of the small wheel around the big wheel.

Another way to look at is assume the big wheel was a single point.  The outer wheel would not &quot;roll&quot; one bit.  A mark on the outer wheel where it touches single point would stay put.  Yet the outer wheel still rotates 1 time around the point.  0 + 1 times.

This works for any two wheels.  Do the simple math like the inner wheel is a straight line and then add 1 rotation.  This interesting single extra rotation does not change no matter the size of either wheel.  It is always one more rotation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the magic trick to this puzzle no one has pointed out yet:</p>
<p>Imagine you open up the large wheel into a straight line.  Easy math tells us the small wheel will roll 5 times around if it travels the length of the straight line.  Well if the line is curved back up into a circle (wheel), then the line is the same length and the small wheel has not changed, so why does it take 6 (instead of 5) rotations to go around?  The answer if 5 + 1 really.  The 5 rotations along the line PLUS one more big rotation of the small wheel around the big wheel.</p>
<p>Another way to look at is assume the big wheel was a single point.  The outer wheel would not &#8220;roll&#8221; one bit.  A mark on the outer wheel where it touches single point would stay put.  Yet the outer wheel still rotates 1 time around the point.  0 + 1 times.</p>
<p>This works for any two wheels.  Do the simple math like the inner wheel is a straight line and then add 1 rotation.  This interesting single extra rotation does not change no matter the size of either wheel.  It is always one more rotation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/comment-page-3/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringdaily.net/?p=554#comment-440</guid>
		<description>Thank you Kevin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Kevin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/comment-page-3/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringdaily.net/?p=554#comment-400</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right Kevin!  Six rotations is correct.  Your drawing showed that a point on the smaller wheel would sweep 432 degrees of arc before contacting the same point again with respect to the larger wheel.  Interesting to note that a 2 cm radius circle would make five 360 degree rotations when traveling from start to end of a straight line that is 2π x 10cm long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right Kevin!  Six rotations is correct.  Your drawing showed that a point on the smaller wheel would sweep 432 degrees of arc before contacting the same point again with respect to the larger wheel.  Interesting to note that a 2 cm radius circle would make five 360 degree rotations when traveling from start to end of a straight line that is 2π x 10cm long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artie</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/comment-page-3/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Artie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringdaily.net/?p=554#comment-398</guid>
		<description>Yes - 5 rotations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8211; 5 rotations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/comment-page-3/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringdaily.net/?p=554#comment-397</guid>
		<description>Nice drawings Kevin.  Try the cardboard cutouts and you will find the answer is 5 rotations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice drawings Kevin.  Try the cardboard cutouts and you will find the answer is 5 rotations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinC</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/comment-page-3/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringdaily.net/?p=554#comment-394</guid>
		<description>and yeah i used 10cm and 2cm as diameters instead of radius but its still proportional to the original problem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and yeah i used 10cm and 2cm as diameters instead of radius but its still proportional to the original problem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinC</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/comment-page-3/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringdaily.net/?p=554#comment-393</guid>
		<description>http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/959/math.jpg

i drew this in ms paint. are you still sure its 5 rotations?
imagine the large wheel is stationary and the smaller wheel is rolling along its edge.
the smaller wheel is marked to indicate how much it rotates.

i believe the first example is what most people think is the correct answer, but it isnt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/959/math.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/959/math.jpg</a></p>
<p>i drew this in ms paint. are you still sure its 5 rotations?<br />
imagine the large wheel is stationary and the smaller wheel is rolling along its edge.<br />
the smaller wheel is marked to indicate how much it rotates.</p>
<p>i believe the first example is what most people think is the correct answer, but it isnt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artie</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/comment-page-3/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Artie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringdaily.net/?p=554#comment-388</guid>
		<description>Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinC</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/comment-page-2/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 05:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringdaily.net/?p=554#comment-376</guid>
		<description>artie are you sure your &quot;rotations&quot; are 360 degrees?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>artie are you sure your &#8220;rotations&#8221; are 360 degrees?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/comment-page-2/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringdaily.net/?p=554#comment-363</guid>
		<description>It appears that we can&#039;t seem to agree on the correct answer. Can anyone provide a video, schematic excel worksheet or other type of evidence to back their answer?
Thank you all for participating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that we can&#8217;t seem to agree on the correct answer. Can anyone provide a video, schematic excel worksheet or other type of evidence to back their answer?<br />
Thank you all for participating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artie</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/comment-page-2/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Artie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringdaily.net/?p=554#comment-360</guid>
		<description>I kept the 10 cm radius circle stationary and rotated the 2 cm radius circle about it, marking each complete revolution on the larger circle.  After one trip around the large circle there were 5 equally spaced marks, not six.  Good call Dave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kept the 10 cm radius circle stationary and rotated the 2 cm radius circle about it, marking each complete revolution on the larger circle.  After one trip around the large circle there were 5 equally spaced marks, not six.  Good call Dave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinC</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/comment-page-2/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringdaily.net/?p=554#comment-350</guid>
		<description>also both wheels are on the same 2-dimensional plane</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also both wheels are on the same 2-dimensional plane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinC</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/comment-page-2/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringdaily.net/?p=554#comment-349</guid>
		<description>you have to remember that the large wheel is stationary and the smaller wheel is moving along the edge. thats the key to this brain teaser.

it takes 6 full rotations (360 degrees each) to make it all the way around

if both wheels were stationary, like a couple of gears, then it would be 5 rotations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you have to remember that the large wheel is stationary and the smaller wheel is moving along the edge. thats the key to this brain teaser.</p>
<p>it takes 6 full rotations (360 degrees each) to make it all the way around</p>
<p>if both wheels were stationary, like a couple of gears, then it would be 5 rotations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artie</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/comment-page-2/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Artie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringdaily.net/?p=554#comment-342</guid>
		<description>5 is correct -  I gave it a spin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5 is correct &#8211;  I gave it a spin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinC</title>
		<link>http://www.engineeringdaily.net/weekly-brain-teaser-consider-a-vertical-wheel-of-radius-10-cm/comment-page-2/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 08:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engineeringdaily.net/?p=554#comment-340</guid>
		<description>6 is the correct answer.

If you can not visualize it, make yourself some cardboard cut-outs and give it a spin. Empirical evidence will always trump endless babbling.

fixed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6 is the correct answer.</p>
<p>If you can not visualize it, make yourself some cardboard cut-outs and give it a spin. Empirical evidence will always trump endless babbling.</p>
<p>fixed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

